SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 936

PATNA HIGH COURT
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J
Saroj Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/s: Mr.Binod Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s: Mr.

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 09-01-2025

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s) :-

“1. That this is a writ petition on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of a writ of Certiorari or writs in the nature thereof or any other appropriate writs/orders/directions for quashing orders dated 9.5.2012 and 18.6.2012 passed by learned Munsif-IV, Chapra, passed in T.S.No. 146 of 1996, whereby the petition dated 19.3.2012 of the plaintiff/ respondent under Order I Rule 8 CPC has been allowed and petition dated 28.5.2012 of the defendant/petitioner for recalling the said order dated 9.5.2012 passed in the aforesaid suit has been rejected.”

2. The learned counsel for the parties have pointed out, at the outset, that earlier writ petitions were being filed against the interlocutory orders (such orders which have not finally decided the suits or proceedings in favour of the parties and the suits or such proceedings have not stood disposed off), in view of the law laid down by the learned Division Bench of this Court in a judgment dated 13.05.2010, passed in C.R. no. 1067 of 2009 (Durga Devi v. Vijay Kumar Poddar & Ors.) however, subsequently, the Hon’ble Apex Court, by a j

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top