SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1321

PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. BIBEK CHAUDHURI, J
Pratik Shail @ Pratik Sail – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.181 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-747 Year-2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Madhumay Madhup, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. C. S. Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Akhilesh Dutt Verma, Advocate
For the State:Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, Advocate

The court upheld the FIR under IPC sections related to dowry death despite claims of natural cause, affirming the need for investigation and distinguishing judicial orders from administrative directives.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 304-B, 34, 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3, 4 - Quashing of FIR - Allegations of dowry-related harassment leading to the death of the petitioner's wife - The court held that the complaint was maintainable despite previous rejections, and upheld the substance of the FIR - Medical evidence indicated death due to abdominal tuberculosis, thus not unnatural, but sufficient prima facie evidence supports allegations under Section 304B - Judicial orders prevail over administrative orders regarding surrender. (Paras 1, 4-6, 79)

(B) Jurisdiction of High Court - Power to quash FIR - High Court can exercise jurisdiction to quash FIR when it does not find any prima facie evidence; however, at the investigative stage, it must refrain from conducting a mini trial. (Paras 10, 56)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a suspended Judicial Officer, challenged an FIR lodged by the informant alleging that he, along with his family, harassed and tortured his wife for dowry demands, leading to her death from tuberculosis. Death was within seven years of marriage, which led to the FIR under IPC provisions concerning dowry death. (Paras 1, 2, 48)

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the allegations and highlighted a need for a thorough investigation, leading to an order for a CBI probe. (Paras 79, 85)

Issues: Key issues included the maintainability of the writ, the prima facie case under Section 304B, and whether the death was caused under unnatural circumstances. (Paras 34, 35)

Ratio Decidendi: The court stated that while the death was due to tuberculosis and not caused by any burns or unusual injury, the presence of prima facie allegations of harassment allows investigation under relevant IPC sections, emphasizing judicial orders over administrative ones. (Paras 74, 84)

Result: Writ petition dismissed; investigation ordered to be referred to CBI, with directions regarding the charges. (Para 85)

Table of Content
1. basis of the writ petition and context of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. petitioner's arguments regarding legal and factual basis for quashing. (Para 3 , 6 , 11)
3. evidence of dowry demand and subsequent actions. (Para 18 , 19 , 22)
4. criteria for assessing dowry death. (Para 34 , 46 , 48 , 78)
5. court's final decision and directives. (Para 79 , 80 , 84)

CAV JUDGMENT

Date : 18-04-2025

1. The petitioner is a suspended Judicial Officer in the cadre of Bihar Judicial Service. He has invoked Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:

“(i) For issuance of appropriate Writ/Writs, direction/directions or orders/order, quashing the Alam Ganj P. S. Case No. 747 of 2023, dated 18/08/2023, registered under sections 304-B & 34 of Indian Penal Code , (45 of 1860) on the basis of fardbyan by Ashok Kumar, son of Late Jagdish Prasad at Paras Hospital on 17/08/2023 at 14.45 hours, against the above-named petitioner.

(ii) To issue further appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents not to take any coercive steps against the Petitioner in pursuance of Alam Ganj P.S. Case No. 747 of 2023, dated 18/08/2023 during pendency of this case.

(iii) For any other relief/reliefs, which this Hon’ble Court may grant in general interest, that may be deemed appropriate and necessary in this case.”

2. It is pertinent to mention at the outset that marriage of the daughter of the informant (Respondent No. 6) was solemnized with the petitioner on 11th of May, 2022. She died in Paras Hospital, Patna on 17th of August, 2023 at about 02.45 p.m. After her death, the informant lodged a complaint to the SHO, Alam Ganj Police Station, on the basis of which Alam Ganj P. S. Case No. 747 of 2023 under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered on 18th of August, 2023. The F.I.R. contained an allegation that after the lapse of one month of marriage of the daughter of the informant with the petitioner, he along with his parents and sister started assaulting the deceased on demand of balance amount of dowry to the tune of Rs. 20,00,000/-. She was threatened that she would not be able to live at her matrimonial home peacefully if the said amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- be not paid to the accused persons. The petitioner along with other accused persons increased the amount of torture upon the deceased daughter of the informant, when they came to know that she informed the incident of physical and mental cruelty to the family members of her paternal home. It was also alleged that in the said marriage, the petitioner and his family members demanded in all Rs. 50,00,000/- as dowry. Out of which Rs. 22,00,000/- was paid in the form of a car valued at Rs. 20,00,000/- and gold ornaments of Rs. 2,00,000/- besides bronze and steel utensils etc. An amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- was paid to the accused at the time of Tilak ceremony. As per the demand of the accused persons, Rs. 20,00,000/- was due towards the arrears dowry amount, for which, the accused persons including the petitioner subjected the daughter of the informant with untold torture. On 13th of August, 2023, the father of the deceased talked to the father of the petitioner and inquired about his daughter. He informed him that everything was well in respect of his daughter. Subsequently, the informant got an information that on 15th of August, 2023 at about 04.12 p.m. that her daughter was admitted to a private nursing home under the name and style of Universal Emergency Hospital and Trauma Centre Private Limited at Kumhrar, Patna with the history of intermittent vomiting since two months with severe left sided periumbilical pain. The patient had history of loose motion and vomiting from two days back from the date of her admission. She was diagnosed with abdominal tuberculosis on the basis of an ultra sonography report done from an institute outside the said nursing home and hypovolaemic shock. The patien

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top