Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA, J
Govind Tulshyan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of allegations based on the fir. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presenting the defense of petitioners. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for the prosecution regarding necessity for investigation. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's observations regarding the fir and guideline application. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. conclusion and quash of fir against petitioners. (Para 16) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 08-08-2025
Heard Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State duly assisted by Mr. Sumit Kumar, learned counsel appearing for informant/O.P. No.2.
2. The present application preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’) by the petitioners for quashing of the First Information Report (in short ‘FIR’) of Patna Kankarbagh P.S. Case No.307 of 2024 registered under Section s 420 , 406, 467, 568, 471, 504, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’).
3. The case of prosecution is based upon the written report of informant/O.P. No.2, namely, Avinash submitted before the S.H.O. Kankarbagh Police Station, alleging therein that in the year 2022, he came in contact with one Kumar Ank
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
