Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
JITENDRA KUMAR, J
Rakesh Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail refusal must be based on actual risk, not only on offense severity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of appellant's background and family before the incident. (Para 4) |
| 3. counsel arguments regarding the inappropriateness of the bail rejection. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. judicial observations on juvenile laws and conditions for bail. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. final ruling granting bail under specified conditions. (Para 17) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 17-01-2025
The present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the impugned order dated 01.11.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st cum Special Judge SC/ST & Children Court, Buxar, in Adult Children Case No. 14 of 2023 arising out of Bagengola P.S. Case No. 100 of 2020 whereby the learned court below has rejected the bail petition of the appellant holding as follows:-
“Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of this case and from perusal of case record, including the Social Investigation Report, it is found that the CICL “R” had been actively involved in this case and during investigation it has come that CICL “R”, had committing the murder of father of informant in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
