Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
JITENDRA KUMAR, J
Bulbul Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of petitioners and case background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims and disputes of both parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. evidence of petitioners including bulbul khatoon. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. evidence of respondent no. 2 and his claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. findings of the trial court. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. parties' submissions regarding maintenance and legality. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 7. scope of the high court's revisional jurisdiction. (Para 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. statutory provisions of maintenance under section 125 cr.pc. (Para 33 , 39 , 41 , 44) |
| 9. assessment of maintenance eligibility under section 125. (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 10. conclusions regarding maintenance awards. (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 07-07-2025
Introduction
The present Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred by the petitioners, praying for setting aside the impugned judgment/order dated 04.04.2020 and direct the O.P. No. 2 to pay Rs. 20,000/- per month to the petitioners towards their maintenance. The impugned order dated 04.04.2020 has been passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court,Purniain Maintenance Case No. 295 of 2017, whereby O.P. No. 2/Md.Shamshadhas been direc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
