Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
P. B. Bajjanthri, S. B. P. D. Singh, JJ
Viahal Kumar @ Guddu – Appellant
Versus
Richa Sah @ Gudiya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against family court judgment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent's defense against divorce claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of the claims. (Para 7 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments on cruelty and desertion. (Para 8 , 19) |
| 5. definition and standards of cruelty. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. judgment dismissal affirmed. (Para 24 , 25) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH)
Date : 17-01-2025
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. However, none appears on behalf of the respondent.
2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 impugning the judgment dated 11.04.2017 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kisanganj in Matrimonial Case No. 145 of 2012, whereby the matrimonial suit, preferred by the appellant-husband, for a decree of divorce, on dissolution of marriage, on the ground of cruelty and desertion, has been dismissed and a cost of Rs. 5000/- was imposed on the appellant-husband to be paid to the respondent-wife.
3. The case of the appellant-husband as per petition filed before the Family Court is that the marriage of the appellant-husband with respondent-wife was solemnized
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
