SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1437

PATNA HIGH COURT
P. B. Bajanthri, S. B. Pd. Singh, JJ
Raju Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Sushila Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/s: Mr. Santosh Kumar Sinha
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Siddharth Harsh

CAV JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH)

Date : 07-02-2025

Heard the parties.

2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act , 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2016 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jehanabad in Matrimonial Case No. 32 of 2013, whereby the matrimonial suit, preferred by the appellant, seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and desertion, has been dismissed.

3. The case of the appellant as per petition filed before the Family Court is that the marriage of the appellant with respondent was solemnized on 24.06.2002 as per Hindu Rights and Customs. After marriage, the respondent came to the house of appellant and lived together as husband and wife for two months. During stay at her matrimonial house, the behaviour of the respondent with her husband and other in-laws family members were not amicable during her stay, the respondent always misbehaved, humiliated and rebuked the appellant-husband in presence of his parents and relatives to lower down the reputation of the appellant. Ultimately, the respondent left her matrimonial house in the year 2009 with all her ornaments

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top