Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
P. B. Bajanthri, S. B. Pd. Singh, JJ
Raju Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Sushila Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's marriage details & allegations of cruelty. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on allegations of cruelty and legal actions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. evidence presented during trial. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. family court's findings and dismissal of the case. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. legal definition and threshold of cruelty. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. judicial precedents on cruelty. (Para 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. evaluation of respondent’s actions as cruelty. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 8. discussion on the maintenance of relationship and evidence gaps. (Para 28 , 30) |
| 9. summary judgment on allegations of cruelty and desertion. (Para 32 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. conclusion affirming family court's decision. (Para 36 , 37) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH)
Date : 07-02-2025
Heard the parties.
2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act , 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2016 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jehanabad in Matrimonial Case No. 32 of 2013, whereby the matrimonial suit, preferred by the appellant, seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and desertion, has been dismissed.
3. The case of the appellant as pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
