Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
P. B. Bajanthri, S. B. P. D. Singh, JJ
Sangita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Kumar Himansu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the legal case details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual summary of the appeals filed (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments presented by the appellant and respondent (Para 9 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court observations on evidence and witness testimonies (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. legal definitions and principles concerning cruelty in divorce (Para 24 , 25) |
| 6. analysis of proof regarding cruelty and desertion (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. conclusions and outcomes of the appeals (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 35 , 36) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH)
Date : 26-03-2025
In these bunch of cases, the issues are common and interrelated, as such, all have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The reliefs sought by the appellant/petitioner are as under:-
2. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 307 of 2015 (Sangita Kumari versus Surendra Kumar Himansu)
“That instant appeal is being preferred against the decree of dissolution of marriage dated 08.05.2015 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jehanabad in Matrimonial Case No. 66/2023 whereby and where under the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jehanabad has been pleased
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
