PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, SHAILENDRA SINGH, JJ
Sarda Ram @ Sardha Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
Date : 24-09-2024
Heard learned counsel for the informant-appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The present appeal has been preferred for setting aside the judgment of acquittal passed by learned Additional Session Judge-III-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gopalganj (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned trial court’) on 14.07.2023 in Gopalganj SC/ST Case No. 48 of 2017, Registration No. 270 of 2017. By the judgment under appeal, the three accused-respondent nos. 2 to 4 who were facing trial for the charges under Sections 341 /34, 323/34, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code , Section 3(i)(r) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (in short ‘SC/ST Act’) and Section 3(i)(w) of the SC/ST Act have been acquitted.
Prosecution Case
3. As per the prosecution story which is based on the written application submitted by the informant, namely, Sarda Ram (PW-4), on 01.11.2017 in the evening hour, at about 04:00 PM, Ashok Mishra, Kashi Mishra and Jai Prakash Mishra, all of village- Baijalaha, Post- Ratanpur, P.S.- Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj along with other unknown persons c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.