Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, SHAILENDRA SINGH, JJ
Sarda Ram @ Sardha Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts surrounding the initial complaint rise due to alleged incidents of violence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims of assault and threats dismissed due to lack of credible testimony and medical evidence. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 21) |
| 3. emphasizes the need for corroborative evidence in cases involving enmity and false implications. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 4. final judgment rests on the principles of reasonable doubt and witness credibility. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
Date : 24-09-2024
Heard learned counsel for the informant-appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The present appeal has been preferred for setting aside the judgment of acquittal passed by learned Additional Session Judge-III-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gopalganj (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned trial court’) on 14.07.2023 in Gopalganj SC/ST Case No. 48 of 2017, Registration No. 270 of 2017. By the judgment under appeal, the three accused-respondent nos. 2 to 4 who were facing trial for the charges under Sections 341 /34, 323/34, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code , Section 3(i)(r) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
