Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. SATYAVRAT VERMA, J
Shio Jee Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of writ petition details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. request for annual increment upon retirement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. implications of annual increment on pension. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal precedents regarding increment denial. (Para 10 , 11 , 18) |
| 5. court’s decision on annual increment entitlement. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 29-04-2025
1. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners, Shri. Tej Bahadur Singh and learned AC to GP-12.
2. The learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant writ petition was filed on 17-5-2019, it is submitted that the said submission has been made regarding filing of writ petition for the reason that it has bearing on the adjudication of the present case.
3. The learned senior counsel further submits that the instant writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 for granting the benefit of annual increment for their last year of service, which has been denied to the petitioners on the grounds that petitioners have retired on 30th June and the annual increment as per 6th Pay Revision and 7th Pay Revision has been made admissible to the employees on 1st of July, further for a dir
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
