SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1714

PATNA HIGH COURT
Ram Ashish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent
CWJC-21398/2018



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21398 of 2018 ======================================================

Ram Ashish Kumar Son of Jibach Yadav Resident of village Mansara, P.s.

Ghanshyampur Distt. Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division Darbhaga.

3. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

4. The District Supply Officer, cum Secretary of District Selection Committee, Darbhanga.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biraul, Darbhanga.

6. The District Selection Committee of the public Distribution system, Darbhanga through its Chairman, 7. The Block Development Officer, Gaura Bauram, Darbhanga.

8. The Circle Officer, Gaura Baurm, Darbhanga.

9. Yasim Parveen Wife of abrar Hussain Resident of village Adharpur, P.s.-

Ghanshyampur, Distt. Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava, Advocate : Mr. Vagisha Pragya, Advocate : Ms. Ankita Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal -Sc4 ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 01-08-2025

1. The writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:

“i) For quashing of the list dated

25.06.2018 passed by the District Selection Committee of the Public Distribution System, Darbhanga (Respondent No. 6) whereby the recommendation of the earlier selected candidate has been rejected and instead of that selection of Private Respondent No. 9 namely Yasmin Praveen recommended. Whereas the respondent no. 9 has already been selected by the District Committee selected vide list dated 01.09.2017.

ii) For direction to the District Selection Committee of the Public Distribution System, Darbhanga (Respondent no. 6) to finally select and recommend the name of the petitioner for fair price shop of the Public Distribution System in Gram Panchayat Raj Adharpur in Gaura Bauram Block of Darbhanga District.

iii) For direction to the respondent authority to produce the license issued to the private respondent no. 9 and further be pleased to cancel the same and issue license to the petitioner in place of her. Further any other writ(s) may be issued direction(s) given or order(s) passed which the petitioner is entitle to the facts and circumstances.”

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii) 32(v) and

32(vi) read as follows:

“32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days.”

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months.

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the provisions of Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016..

4. The remedy available under the Act is to p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top