PATNA HIGH COURT
SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
M/s Ramay Enterprise, through it’s Managing Partner Birendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India through the Divisional Railway Manager Eastern Central Railway Danapur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims for payment of completed contract work. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents assert delays by petitioners caused non-payment. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 3. court recognizes obligation to pay despite procedural issues. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. court directs payment to be made within two months. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 14-10-2025
1 The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs:
“for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders direction/ directions to the respondent authorities to make payment of outstanding dues bill amount relating to the contract work namely “The through turn out renewal of existing point and crossing with 52 kg fan shaped curve switches and renewal of derailing switches with
52 kg new one in P.G. sector of Danapur Railway Division"
With interest as the work aforesaid contract of which was given to the petitioner has already been completed and though the final bill of the work has already been prepared and submitted but only part of the total bill amount has been paid to the petitioner and remaining bill amount has still not been paid to the petitioner. The petitioner further prays for any other relief(s) for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.