Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application for no objection certificate. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. refusal based on hypothetical concerns unsupported by statutory norms. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. state's duty to protect life and property concerning safety. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. circular procedures and appeal considerations. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's finding on compliance with safety norms. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final decision to allow the writ petition. (Para 15) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 14-10-2025
1 The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs:
“I. To set aside the order contained in Letter No. 26-0/2018-2907 dated 18-09-2018 by which the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Mazaffarpur, has rejected application of Petitioner preferred against the order passed by the District Magistrate, Vaishali, refusing to grant 'No-Objection Certificate' applied for obtaining license to establish new Retail Outlet (Petrol Pump), awarded by the respondent Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
II. To set aside the order contained in Memo No. 1049 dated 25-5-2018 by which the District Magistrate, Vaishali, refused to grant 'No-Objection Certificate’ applied for obtaining license for establishme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
