Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Sangita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for selection cancellation. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. discussion of alternative remedies under the law. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court's directive on filing a complaint/application. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. final ruling on disposition of the writ petition. (Para 7) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 14-10-2025
1. The writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:-
“(A) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari setting aside the resolution No.17 dated 25.10.18 adopted by Selection Committee cancelling the selection of petitioner as P.D.S. dealer at roster point no. 63 and on the same time selecting Respondent No.10 Meena Kumari on the ground that she is physically handicapped.
(B) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the Respondents to allot P.D.S. dealership licence of petitioner either at roster point of 61 (unreserved female) or roster point no. 63 unreserved under Hardi East Gram Panchayat, Block + District-
Supaul.
(C) Any other relief or reliefs, writ or writs, direction or directions which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances may also be granted.”
2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for the respondents contended tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
