Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Sunita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief after failed selection. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. alternative remedies provided under applicable laws. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court directs filing of application with delay condonation. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. writ petition disposed of. (Para 7) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 14-10-2025
1. The present Writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:-
“I. To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of certiorari for for quashing the selection of Respondent no.5 as Fair Price Dealer under the Public Distribution System in pursuant to the memo no. 410/supply/Sherghati/dated 21.09.2017 for Block Guruaa, Panchayat-Tubba, Village Gullani, who being ineligible for selection, has been selected illegally by rejecting the application of the Petitioner inspite of her having higher marks qua respondent no. 5.
II. To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to select the Petitioner as Fair Price Dealer under the Public Distribution system in pursuant to the memo no. 410/supply/Sherghati/dated 21.09.2017 for Block Guruaa, Panchayat-Tubba, Village – Gullani, as the Petitioner is eligible for the appointment and more suitable
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
