Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Sanjiva Kumar Singh @ Sanjiv Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the alleged crime. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the nature of the complaint. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. criteria for assessing criminal complaints. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. consideration of attending circumstances in judicial decisions. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 5. conclusion and directions for the trial court. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 14-10-2025
Heard Ms. Shashi Priya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Murli Dhar, learned APP for the State.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS , 2023 for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 16.11.2024 in connection with Complaint Case No.260/22, whereby cognizance has been taken by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur under Sections 341 , 323, 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code .
3. As per the allegation made in the complaint, on 29.05.2022 at about 8:00 AM, the petitioner along with other named accused persons and several unidentified individuals allegedly entered the agricultural field of the complainant situated at Village Pagra, P.S. Dalsinghsarai, District Samastipur. It is alleged that the accused perso
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
