Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, HONOURABLE MR. SOURENDRA PANDEY, JJ
Nathuni Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the initial facts of the case. (Para 2 , 5 , 11) |
| 2. court's findings on circumstantial evidence. (Para 12 , 13 , 26) |
| 3. arguments concerning confessions and acquittals. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's conclusion on the convictions and acquittals. (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
Date : 14-10-2025
Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the respondents [in Cr. App (DB) No. 398 of 2023]; Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant [in Cr. App (DB) No. 266 of 2023] and Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Cr. App (DB) No. 398 of 2023
2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant- informant for setting aside the part of the judgment and order of acquittal dated 17.01.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned judgment of acquittal’) whereby and whereunder the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge IX, Kaimur at Bhabhua (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned Trial Court’) has been pleased to acquit respondent nos. 2 to 6 of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
