Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
S. B. Pd. Singh, J
Vijay Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Umesh Yadav – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for intervention based on property interest. (Para 2) |
| 2. debate on the locus standi of the petitioners. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's evaluation of trial implications. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. justification for recognizing intervenors as proper parties. (Para 7) |
| 5. final ruling allowance for petitioners. (Para 8) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 14-10-2025 The present Civil Miscellaneous application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 18.03.2021 (Annexure-5) passed in Title Suit No. 15 of 2018 (CF No. 11 of 2018) by the Court of Sub Judge-1st, Madhubani whereby and whereunder the petition dated 19.04.2019 filed by the intervenors/petitioners for being added as party in the Title Suit No. 15 of 2018 has been rejected by the learned Court below.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Title Suit No. 11 of 2018 has been filed by Umesh Yadav against the State of Bihar and Circle Officer, Rahika, Madhubani for declaration of his title and confirmation of possession over the suit property mentioned in the plaint and other ancillary relief(s). The petitioner filed a petition under Order I Rule 10 for his impleadment in the aforesaid suit on the basis of the fact that suit p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
