Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, J
Kumari Bandana and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legality of petitioners' appointments. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the authority's jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. issues for consideration regarding jurisdiction. (Para 13) |
| 4. statutory scheme and authority limits. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. review power and its statutory basis. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. final decision and direction to accept joining. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The present writ application has been filed for the following reliefs:
i. For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the Order dated 24.08.2017 passed in Appeal No. 83 of 2017 passed by the learned State Appellate Authority, Bihar, Patna whereby the Appeal preferred by the Petitioners have been rejected on baseless grounds which were never in issue without application of judicious mind.
ii. For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the Order dated 25.01.2016 passed by the Member, District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Buxar in Case No. 04 of 2013 whereby the Appeal preferred by the Petitioners have been rejected reviewi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
