Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ALOK KUMAR SINHA, J
Satya Prakash – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India through the Secretary, Department of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India, New Delhi. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's employment details and allegations of arbitrary termination. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondent's defense about the legality of termination. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. statutory framework governing employment and ramifications of contractual terms. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. inadequate justification for termination under contractual terms. (Para 27 , 28 , 30 , 32) |
| 5. limits of emergency powers under section 11(3) of the act. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. ratification cannot validate unauthorized actions; need for factual basis in exercising powers. (Para 41 , 42 , 46) |
| 7. probationer rights and protections under article 14. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. entitlement to back wages based on employment status during termination period. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 58) |
| 9. court's judgment on reinstatement and denial of back wages. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date- 16-12-2025.
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner in the present writ application has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the office order no. 138/15 datd 18.09.2015 whereby, as per the petitioner, the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
