Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Ankit Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of fir for alleged offenses. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments about mediation and interim relief's effect. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. importance of upholding the fir's investigation process. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court evaluates the sufficiency of allegations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. preliminary inquiries in matrimonial disputes advised. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. scope of court's jurisdiction under section 482 cr.p.c. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. need for careful court intervention in marital disputes. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. court quashes fir urging reconciliation. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 16-12-2025
Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State and Mr. Ashish Giri, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Rajat Kumar Tiwary and Deepika Sharma, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the Informant.
2. The petitioner has preferred the application under Section 4 82 Cr.P.C. / 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR bearing Nayagaon P.S. Case No.184 of 2024 registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 85, 352, 351(2), 79, 3(5) of the BNS, corresponding to Section s 3 41 , 323, 354, 498A, 504, 506, 509 and 34 of the Indian Penal C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
