Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, HONOURABLE MR. DR. ANSHUMAN, JJ
The State of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the context and facts surrounding the disciplinary actions against the respondent are addressed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the application of rules and scope of judicial review. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. analysis of the findings by the single judge and legal implications regarding rule 18. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. the conclusive determination regarding the validity of the single judge's ruling. (Para 14) |
| 5. final order dismissing the appeal. (Para 15) |
C.A.V. JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN)
Date : 16-12-2025
Heard learned counsel for the appellant-State and the respondent.
2. The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the oral judgment dated 28.03.2024, as modified by the oral order dated 16.04.2024, passed in CWJC No. 7162 of 2016, whereby the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner–respondent herein has been allowed by quashing the order of punishment dated 22.10.2014 contained in Memo No. 1557, as well as the order dated 10.08.2015 issued by the Additional Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, contained in Notification No. 1772. The learned Single Judge has further directed th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
