SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 51

PATNA HIGH COURT
SANDEEP KUMAR, J
SURAJ THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/s: Mr.Iqbal Asif Niazi
For the Respondents: Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Mr. Kedar Jha

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

19 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P. for the State.

2. Since Mr. Kedar Jha, learned Advocate had appeared for the same informant in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 1365/2022, he requested this Court to argue this case and he is allowed to do the same.

3. This appeal has been preferred for quashing the order dated 26.11.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1st -cum-Special Judge (SC/ST {P.O.A} Act), whereunder cognizance of the offences under Sections

341, 323, 354, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act has been taken against the appellant and five others.

4. As per the prosecution case, on February 7, 2021, co-accused Suraj Thakur dragged the informant’s sister Gudiya Kumari (19 years) toward his car. When the informant intervened, all named accused and 4-5 unknown armed persons arrived, abused him by caste name, and assaulted him and his family members with deadly weapons.

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case and no offence is made out against the appell

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top