SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 80

PATNA HIGH COURT
SATYAVRAT VERMA, J
Ramesh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary
For the Respondents: Mr. Mohammed Arif, A.P.P.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

2 02-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(4), 303(2), 351, 74 and 352 of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that six named accused persons including the petitioner came on 06.09.2025, at 08:00 p.m., and assaulted him by fighter causing injury on his head and eye and also assaulted the brother and nephew of the informant and acted inappropriately with women member and snatched the chain.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant i.e. Sonu Kumar. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant alleges that he was assaulted by the accused persons but then the allegation of assault is not specific. It is next submitted that even t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top