Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
Guddu Miyan @ Haider Ali @ Guddu Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant is accused of committing serious offenses resulting in death and injury. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the trial court found sufficient evidence supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. defense raised issues regarding witness reliability and evidence appreciation. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. the defense argument did not undermine the prosecution's confidence in witness credibility. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. the appeal was dismissed as the trial judgment was upheld by the appellate court. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
Date : 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This appeal has been preferred for setting aside the judgment of conviction dated 24.11.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned judgment’) and order of sentence dated 06.12.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned order’) passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-III, Sheikhpura (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned trial court’) in Session Case No. 20 of 2015/ Trial No. 64 of 2022 arising out of Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 362 of 2011. By the impugned judgment
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
