Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
Jitendra Kumar @ Kunkun – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court procedural and appearance details (Para 1 , 10) |
| 2. conviction and sentencing details (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. defense and prosecution arguments (Para 8 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. witness testimony evaluation (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 30) |
| 5. medical evidence concerning assault (Para 28 , 29 , 34 , 35) |
| 6. conclusions regarding victim's status and consent (Para 31 , 32 , 36 , 44) |
| 7. final judgment and order (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 20-01-2026
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The name of the victim has not been disclosed in the present judgment to protect her privacy, prestige and dignity.
3. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 20.01.2025 and order of sentence dated 24.01.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge –VIth cum Special Judge, POCSO Act , Patna in Special Sessions Trial POCSO Case No. 75 of 2022, arising out of Digha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2022 whereby and whereunder the appellant/ Jitendra Kumar @ Kunkun has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 363 of IPC an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
