Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
DHAMALU PANDEY @ AJAY KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction and sentencing details. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for the defense's lack of evidence. (Para 9 , 14 , 28) |
| 3. consideration of evidentiary standards. (Para 15 , 16 , 21) |
| 4. importance of proper sanction for prosecution. (Para 25 , 31) |
| 5. result and implications of judgment. (Para 33 , 34 , 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 22-01-2026
Heard learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.08.2009 passed by learned 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 259 of 08 / 18 of 2009, arising out of Kateya P.S. Case No. 74 of 2006 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26(1) and 26(2) of the Arms Act and Section 414 of IPC . The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years under Section 25(1-b)(a) of the Arms Act , rigorous imprisonment for seven years under Section 26(1) of the Arms Act and rigorous imprisonment for seven years under Section 26(2) of the Arms Act . The appellant has further b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
