Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
Karan Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident details and parties involved. (Para 4) |
| 2. charge details against appellants. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. inconsistencies in witness statements. (Para 9 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. defense arguments on inadequacies in evidence. (Para 10) |
| 5. arguments supporting prosecution's case. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. testimonies of key witnesses. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. medical evidence and its reliability. (Para 22 , 24) |
| 8. evaluation of evidence and inconsistencies. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. principle of proof beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 32) |
| 10. court's conclusion and order. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 22-01-2026
Pursuant to order of this Court, a report has been received from Sr. S.P., Bhagalpur which reveals that the appellant No. 3, Rajkumar Chaudhary, has died during the pendency of this appeal. In light of the said report, the appeal against appellant No.3 stands abated.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.P.P. for the State.
3. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 29.08.2009 and order of sentence dated 03.09.2009, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. II, Bhagalpur in Sessions Trial No. 239 of 2002, whereby and whereunder appel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
