Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, HONOURABLE MR. SHAILENDRA SINGH, JJ
Union of India through Senior Divisional Engineer, East Central Railway, Sonpur, District- Saran – Appellant
Versus
M/s Mahnar Infratech Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal based on limitation (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appellant's argument on limitation reckoning (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. application of sections 33 and 34 of the act (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. limitation's strict adherence (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. impact of disposal dates on limitation (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. distinction of relevant cases (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. final outcome of the appeal (Para 27 , 28) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
Date : 06-01-2026
Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Manish Sahay, learned counsel for the claimant-respondent.
2. The present appeal has been preferred for setting aside the order dated 04.07.2024 passed by learned District Judge, Saran at Chapra (hereinafter ‘the learned court’) in Miscellaneous Arbitration Case No. 05 of 2022 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned order’).
3. By the impugned order, the learned court has been pleased to reject the application preferred by the appellant under Section 34 (1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1996’ or ‘1996 Act’) challenging the part of the arbitral
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
