Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA, J
Pramod Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar Agrawal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case facts and tenant's history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's claim of ownership and suit incompetency. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. opposition's argument on maintaining tenant-landlord relationship. (Para 8) |
| 4. scope of revisional jurisdiction under cpc. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. legal principles on joint ownership and tenancy. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. doctrine of lis pendens and tenant's rights. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. court's finding on no error in trial court's order. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. conclusion dismissing the civil revision. (Para 19) |
CAV ORDER
18 06-02-2026
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Counsel for the respondent.
2. This Civil Revision application has been filed against the order dated 30.11.2022 passed by the learned Sub- st st Judge 1 -cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1 , Patna (hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial Court’) in Eviction Suit No. 98 of 2011 whereby and whereunder the petition filed by the petitioner/defendant under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) for dismissal of the suit, as due to subsequent development, the suit became incompetent and not fit to proceed, has been reject
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
