SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 322

PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. SHAILENDRA SINGH, J
Mithun Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/s: Ms. Kirti Kumari, (Amicus Curiae)
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Z.Hoda, APP.

JUDGMENT

Date : -02-2026

The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment of conviction dated 02.11.2013 and order of sentence dated 07.11.2013 respectively passed by the court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Katihar in Sessions Trial No. 188 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1456 of 2007. By the impugned judgment the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’). By the impugned order of sentence he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the IPC.

2. Here it is relevant to mention that the appellant and other two accused persons namely Bhudev Singh and Bhulia Devi were also charged for the offences punishable under section 313 and 504 read with section 34 of the IPC and they were acquitted of the said charged offences.

Prosecution story

3. The prosecution story appearing from the victim’s complaint in brief is as follows:-

As per the victim (examined as PW-4) on 28.02.2007 her father had gone outside her village to earn livelihood and her mother had also gone to the house of her elder sister. On that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top