Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
BHARATH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on behalf of the appellant regarding lack of evidence (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments presented by the state (Para 12 , 32 , 34) |
| 4. court's observations on witness credibility (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 20 , 22 , 25 , 33) |
| 5. judgment and final conclusions on the appeal (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 06-12-2025
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The present appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.10.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C No. 5, Kaimur at Bhabua in S.T. No. 65 of 2004, Tr. No. 56 of 2004, arising out of Bhabua P.S. Case No. 74 of 2003 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 364(A)/395 of IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years along with fine of Rs. 2,000/- each under Section 364(A)/395 of IPC and in case of default of payment of fine, appellant has to undergo further simple imprisonment for two months each.
3.According to fardbeyan of informant/Satya
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
