Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ALOK KUMAR PANDEY, J
Dhuri Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court’s jurisdiction and authority acknowledgment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the underlying criminal complaint. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments concerning the validity of prosecution and evidence. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. importance of thorough evidence evaluation. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. assessment of witness credibility and the issue of chance witnesses. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. doubt cast over authenticity of the complaint. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 7. reversal of trial court's conviction due to lack of evidence. (Para 27) |
| 8. conclusion, order of appeal, and legal fee directive. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 06-12-2025
In pursuance of order dated 25.09.2025, the Superintendent of Police, West Champaran, Bettiah has sent its report vide letter No. 747 dated 12.11.2025 which reveals that appellant no. 1 Dhuri Sah has already died accordingly, the appeal stands abated in respect of appellant no. 1 Dhuri Sah.
2. Heard learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant no.2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. The present appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.12.2004 passed by learned Addit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
