Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ARUN KUMAR JHA, J
Kari Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction for rape with a seven-year sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. trial court proceedings and evidence presented. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments challenging the reliability of eyewitnesses. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's consideration of prosecution's evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. critical examination of testimonies and contradictions. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. defense evidence and its implications on the case. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. judgment on insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 27) |
| 8. set aside conviction and acquit the appellant. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. acknowledgment of legal assistance and payment order. (Para 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 22-12-2025
The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction dated 10.02.2005 and order of sentence dated 11.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Darbhanga in Sessions Trial No. 186/1997 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case are that the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
