Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. PURNENDU SINGH, J
Tulsi Kumar Saw – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the marriage and allegations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding compromise and quashing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court’s analysis and observations on compromises. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. supreme court's precedent on quashing criminal proceedings. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. evaluation of compromise validity based on judicial precedents. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. final order and direction regarding case quashing. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 09-12-2025
Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Sanket, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred the application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the entire criminal proceeding initiated against the petitioner with regard to Kurtha P.S. Case No. 41 of 2009 registered for offences punishable under Section 498A /380 of the Indian Penal Code and all consequential orders including the judgment dated 29.04.2015 passed in G.R. No. 495/09/TR No. 679/15 arising out of the aforesaid F.I.R. whereby the petitioner has been convicted under Section 498A of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
