Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. RAJIV ROY, J
ANUSHREE SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. family dispute with allegations of harassment (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioners allege retaliatory legal actions (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court's need for careful examination of complaints (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 32) |
| 4. opposite parties claim concealed facts from the petitioners (Para 25 , 26 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. justification for taking cognizance of the allegations (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. court's decision to allow quashing in one case while dismissing others (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
CAV JUDGMENT
Date : 19-12-2025
Heard Mr. Anshul, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners duly assisted by Ms. Tooba Hera and Mr. Pratyush and learned Senior counsel for the opposite party, Mr. Bindhaychal Singh duly assisted by Mr. Sanjeev Saran in all the three cases as also learned APPs, Mr. Pranav Kumar, Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh and Mr. Umanath Mishra for the State.
(A) FACTS OF THE CASES:
(i) Cr. Misc. No. 45169 of 2024
2. The present petition has been preferred:
“for the quashing of the order dated 15.09.2022 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 5992(C) of 2022, in which cognizance has been taken against the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
