PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. SHAILENDRA SINGH, J
Parikshit Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Government of India – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10291 of 2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land ownership and acquisition details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding land acquisition process. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. determination of compensation and negligence of authorities. (Para 5) |
| 4. conclusion and directions for compensation. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 18-12-2025
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs :-
“(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing of the Notice published on 21-4-2021 under the signature of the respondent no. 3 by which under Section 11 (1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act") the Preliminary Notification has been issued for acquisition of the land of the petitioner for Rail Corridor for Buxar Thermal Power Station.
(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing and commanding the respondents not to acquire the land of the petitioner for the purpose of construction of the Rail Corridor for Buxar Thermal Power Station and to use the Government land available in the vicinity for the said purpose.
(iii) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing and commanding the respondents to pay the petitioner the amount of compensation according to market rate by treating the land of the petitioner as commercial in nature with 100% soletium and interest as well as compensation amount for the Factory / Industry situated over the said land of the petitioner if at all the land in question of the petitioner is acquired and also to make available the suitable land to the petitioner to set up his Industry/Factory.
(iv) For any other relief/reliefs of which the petitioner is legally entitled.”
2. Mr. Dilip Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Navnit Kumar, learned AC to GP-18 for the State-respondents, are present and they are heard.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner along with one Sri Raghuveer Singh is the owner/holder of the land pertaining to Plot No. 1698, Khata No. 367, Thana No. 02, measuring 4.97 acres, situated at Mauza- Chausa, in the district of Buxar and to the said effect on 12.12.2019 the Land Possession Certificate (LPC) was issued in favour of the petitioner and Sri Raghuveer Singh. From the perusal of the said LPC (Annexure-1), of which land receipt has been filed as Annexure-2, it is itself evident that till 2019-20 the rent for the said land was paid. Earlier the survey plot Nos. 2038, 2039, 2047, 2048, 2051, 2052, 2055, 2057, 2058, 2077 & 2078 measuring 2.057 acres belonged to others, however, after consolidation proceedings, the said plots were allotted to the petitioner and were included in the plot No. 1698 measuring 4.97 acres and the petitioner along with Raghuveer Singh became the owner of the said land. Learned counsel further submitted that over the said plot No. 1698, by setting up a factory/industry, the petitioner was running his business after getting the registration certificate of the GST issued on 20.09.2017 by the Government of India and a copy of the registration certificate has been filed as Annexure-3 to the petition. On the basis of survey done in the year 1906-08, the Khatiyan was prepared in which the said plots were mentioned/described as agricultural land with the name of their respective land holders and thereafter, several years have passed and the entire area/locality has changed and now, in the vicinity of these plots, several commercial activities are being conducted. Learned counsel further submitted that as the petitioner had set up an industry/factory over the land pertaining to Plot No. 1698, so, for conversion of the nature of the said plot from agricultural to commercial, the petitioner had filed a petition before the competent authority upon which the authority vide its order contained in the letter No. 609 dated 16.12.2019 asked the Circle Officer, Chausa, to make an enqu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.