Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Jitendra Kumar, J
Princekant Kumar @ Prinskant Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks anticipatory bail for his arrest. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues innocence and improper seizure. (Para 3) |
| 3. state argues against granting anticipatory bail. (Para 6) |
| 4. court analyzes evidence presented. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court highlights legal precedents on vehicle seizure. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. court emphasizes protection of property rights. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. court grants bail and orders dissemination of ruling. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
2 10-12-2025
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 190 of 2025 dated 18.06.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act , 2022.
2. As per the allegation, two persons, who are co-accused, were riding on a motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR-21Q-2509, which belongs to the petitioner and as per further case of the prosecution, the pillion rider of the motorcycle was carrying a pithubag on his back containing 6 litre illicit liquor. The FIR was lodged against the Petitioner, who was owner of the vehicle as well as two accused, who were riding the motorcycle at
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
