SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1859

PATNA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, DR. ANSHUMAN, JJ
Chhedan Yadav @ Khedan Yadav and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 327 of 2018 | CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No. 365 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Ujjwal Shandilya, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, Advocate, Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma

Victim's testimony is crucial in sexual assault cases; it can alone substantiate conviction when credible, supported by medical evidence and witness accounts, despite minor inconsistencies.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 341, 323, 307/34, 376(g)/34 - POCSO Act - Section 6 - Conviction and sentencing of defendants for serious offenses, including rape and assault - Court upheld conviction for Section 6 of POCSO Act for one appellant and under Section 307 for all three based on compelling evidence of victim corroborated by witnesses and medical reports. (Paras 1, 66)

(B) Evidence of Victim - In sexual assault cases, testimony of the victim carries significant weight and can suffice for conviction - Discrepancies in statements do not automatically undermine credibility if overall narrative is consistent and believable. (Paras 40, 50)

Facts of the case:
Victim, a minor, testified that she was assaulted by multiple defendants, identified them during the incident, and medical examinations substantiated injuries consistent with sexual assault. (Paras 5, 38)

Findings of Court:
The Court acknowledged the compelling nature of the evidence provided by the victim and corroborated by witnesses, leading to substantiation of charges. (Paras 51-63)

Issues: Whether sufficient evidence existed for the conviction of appellants beyond reasonable doubt, specifically concerning identification and corroboration of the victim's statements. (Paras 30, 40)

Ratio Decidendi: Court affirmed the principle that a victim's testimony can alone suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, provided it instills confidence and is consistent, with the evidence of witnesses further solidifying the verdict. (Paras 44, 60)

Result: Appeal allowed in part; Bijali Yadav convicted under POCSO Act, sentenced to 10 years; Chhedan Yadav and Rajo Sah acquitted of certain charges. (Paras 66, 67)

Table of Content
1. details of the criminal case and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
2. victim's testimony and medical examination findings. (Para 9 , 11 , 20 , 21)
3. defence arguments questioning evidence and testimony. (Para 24 , 26 , 28 , 30)
4. prosecution's rebuttal to defense arguments. (Para 33 , 35 , 36)
5. court analyzes evidence and establishes credibility. (Para 38 , 40 , 49 , 51)
6. court's judgment on the conviction and sentencing. (Para 62 , 64 , 66)
7. final outcome of the appeals and orders. (Para 68)

CAV JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI)

Date : 12-12-2025

1. The appellants along with four other accused persons faced trial in POCSO Case No. 23 of 2014, arising out of Nouhatta P. S. Case No. 173 of 2014 and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court-cum-Special Judge, POCSO at Saharsa held the appellant and two other accused persons guilty for committing offence under Sections 341 , 323, 307/34 and 376(g)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act . The appellants and the other accused persons were convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for a term of one year with fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default further imprisonment for one month, for committing offence under Section 323 of the IPC; simple imprisonment for one month for committing offence under 341 of the I.P.C.; rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default further imprisonment for three months for the offence under Section 307/34 of the I.P.C.; and imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 50,000/- each, in default further imprisonment for one and a half years, for the offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act .

2. The appellant, namely, Bijali Yadav @ Kamlesh Yadav has preferred Cr. Appeal No. 365 of 2018, assailing the judgement of conviction and the order of sentence, as narrated above.

3. Convicts, Chhedan Yadav @ Khedan Yadav and Rajo Sah also preferred a separate appeal being Cr. Appeal No. 327 of 2018 against the same judgement and order of conviction passed in the above-mentioned case.

4. As both the appeals were filed, assailing the same judgement of conviction and order of sentence, this Court took up both the appeals together for hearing and proceeds to dispose of the appeals by the following common judgement.

5. Brief facts of the case: -

A minor girl, aged about 16 years of village –

Murali, under Darhara outpost, within Police Station- Nouhatta, district – Saharsa made a statement before the Sub- Inspector of Police, Panch Lal Yadav of Darhara outpost on 15th of September, 2014 at about 11.30 a.m., stating, inter alia, that on 14th of September, 2014 (Sunday), at about 11.00 p.m., she was feeding milk to a baby goat (kid). Her younger sister aged about 7 years was sleeping on a cot in front of the entrance gate of their house. While, she was feeding milk to the goat, she lay on the cot where her sister was lying. Eventually, she fell asleep. After some time, at about 11.30 p.m., she suddenly fell down from the cot and woke up. She had a torch in her possession. She lit the torch and found accused Bijali Yadav, Chhedan Yadav and Rajo Sah of the same village caught hold of her and started to pull her to get her to an open field (Badhar) by the side of their house. The victim raised hue and cry and her younger sister woke up. In the meantime, the accused persons took her to an open field outside the village (Bahiyar). The victim was crying for help but the accused persons started assaulting her on her face. Thereafter, Chhedan Yadav and Rajo Yadav caught hold of the hands of the victim and taking advantage, Bijali Yadav committed indecent act with her (mere sath bura karne laga). The victim told them that she identified all of them. On this, the accused persons climb on the chest of the victim and was conversing amongst themselves that since the victim identified them, she would be killed. The victim was crying relentlessly out of fear, which attracted Ramu Mandal, Pradip Mandal and Anil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top