Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, DR. ANSHUMAN, JJ
Chhedan Yadav @ Khedan Yadav and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the criminal case and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. victim's testimony and medical examination findings. (Para 9 , 11 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. defence arguments questioning evidence and testimony. (Para 24 , 26 , 28 , 30) |
| 4. prosecution's rebuttal to defense arguments. (Para 33 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. court analyzes evidence and establishes credibility. (Para 38 , 40 , 49 , 51) |
| 6. court's judgment on the conviction and sentencing. (Para 62 , 64 , 66) |
| 7. final outcome of the appeals and orders. (Para 68) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI)
Date : 12-12-2025
1. The appellants along with four other accused persons faced trial in POCSO Case No. 23 of 2014, arising out of Nouhatta P. S. Case No. 173 of 2014 and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court-cum-Special Judge, POCSO at Saharsa held the appellant and two other accused persons guilty for committing offence under Sections 341 , 323, 307/34 and 376(g)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act . The appellants and the other accused persons were convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for a term of one year with fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default further imprisonment for o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
