Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. ARUN KUMAR JHA, J
Vikash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the kidnapping and denial of bail (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against granting bail (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observations on juvenile rehabilitation (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. legal provisions guiding juvenile bail decisions (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling allowing bail with conditions (Para 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The instant criminal revision petition has been filed seeking bail in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 registered for the offences under Sections 364(A)/34 of IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and for setting aside the order dated 04.12.2024 passed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya and judgment dated 06.02.2025 passed by learned Special Judge (Children Court), Gaya in Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the learned appellate court while confirming the order dated 04.12.2024 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in Misc. No. 490 of 2024, arising out of Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024, refused to grant bail to the petitioner/child in conflict with law (for short 'CICL').
3. Briefly stated the facts of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
