Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Arun Kumar Jha, J
Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjit Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case facts. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. assessment of the child's best interests. (Para 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal standards governing bail for juveniles. (Para 8) |
| 5. final order granting bail. (Para 11) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. However, there is no representation on behalf of the informant though vakalatnama has been filed.
2. The instant criminal revision petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 21.01.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st -cum- Special Judge, Children Court, Saharsa in Criminal Appeal No. 17 of 2024 and the order dated 24.04.2024 passed by learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Saharsa in J.J.B. 31 of 2024, arising out of Salkhua P.S. Case No. 240 of 2022 registered for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, whereby and whereunder both the courts below refused to grant bail to the petitioner.
3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the husband of the informant was shot at by six miscreants, who died in course of his tre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
