Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Chandra Shekhar Jha, J
Prayag Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the case, including charges against the appellants. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the prosecution's evidence and contradictions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 3. determination of intent and reasonable doubt. (Para 19 , 27) |
| 4. evaluation of witness credibility and evidence. (Para 20 , 26) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 06-12-2025 Heard Mr. Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. From perusal of record, it appears that appellant nos. 1 and 2 were on bail in terms of order dated 23.04.2004 whereas appellant no. 3 was granted bail in terms of order dated 25.06.2004 as passed by one of the learned coordinate Bench of this Court.
3. This memo of appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellants under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the, ‘Cr.P.C.’) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28.01.2004 passed in Sessions Trial No. 162 of 1993 by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Civil Court, Bettiah, whereby and whereunder the appellant namely, Ram Nath Choudhary has been sentenced t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
