Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. PARTHA SARTHY, J
Alok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Bank of Baroda – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. assessment of financial eligibility under compassionate grounds. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. recognition of ex gratia payment eligibility. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 4. clarification of income thresholds for financial support. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final disposition of the writ application. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 01-12-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent-Bank.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs :-
“(i) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing letter dated 30.07.2020 (Annexure- 3) and letter dated 18.09.2021 (Annexure- 4) vide which the claim of the Petitioner for compassionate appointment under the Scheme for compassionate Appointment or payment of ex-gratia Financial Relief to dependents of deceased employees has been ejected on the ground that "the financial condition of the family is not indigent". The Respondent Bank while rejecting the claim has ignored its own definition of "indigent condition" as provided in Annexure- 5 & 5A wherein it is defined that the family condition will be considered as indigen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
