Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Shyamal Mishra – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks benefits denied due to non-examination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. relevant court ruling clarifies acp benefit criteria. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. further review of the case required based on above ruling. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. decision to be communicated post representation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. case disposed with observations and directions. (Para 12) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 01-12-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs:-
“(i). For issuance of an appropriate writ\writs, order/orders, direction/direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order No.15/2024- 25 passed by District Magistrate, Kaimur Respondent No.2 vide Memo No. XIX-03-25/491/Stha dated 04.04.2025 whereby the respondent no.2 has rejected the claim of petitioner regarding grant of benefits or 2nd ACP\MACP to the petitioner from the date of his joining and respondent no.2 has also rejected the claim of petitioner regarding payment of Grade Pay of Rs. 4600/- to the petitioner.
(ii). For issuance of an appropriate writ writs, order orders, direction directions in the nature of m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
