PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNNENDU SINGH, J
Mahesh Thakur @ Mahesh Kumar Thakur – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request to quash cognizance order due to land dispute settlement. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court discusses previous decisions affecting quashing in non-serious offences. (Para 5 , 7) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 02-12-2025 Heard Mr. Sanobar Shahnaz, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. (Dr.) Indiwar Kumari, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred the application under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the order taking cognizance dated 29.02.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 374 of 2022 by which the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence against the petitioner under Sections 34 1 , 323, 307, 379, 504, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, informs that the petitioner and informant are co-villagers and due to land dispute an altercation took place between the parties, for which the present FIR has been lodged. Learned counsel further informs that the parties have already filed the compromise petition on 17.06.2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sama
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.