SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1953

PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNEINDU SINGH, J
CHANDRA BHUSHAN SINGH @ CHANDRA BHUSHAN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Tej Pratap Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 04-12-2025 Heard Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 BNSS for quashing of the order dated 20.02.2020 passed in Complaint Case No.525(C)/2019, by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi, by which he has taken cognizance of the offences under Sections 193 , 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code . He further seeks quashing of entire proceeding in connection with Complaint Case No.525(C)/2019.

3. Brief facts of the case are that dispute arises out of a piece of land, relating to a property located in village Kadimpur Nima (now known as Nima), Paragna Sandha, P.S. Massaurhi (now Dhanarua), District Patna, appertaining to Khata No.231, Khesra Nos.1489 and 1490. Petitioner claims himself to be the descendant of one late Hittan Singh, in whose share, the aforesaid land came into possession as per the judgment and decree passed in Title Partition Suit No.35 of 1924. The opposite party no.2/complainant is also descendant of said late Hittan Singh. The petitioner was in peaceful possessio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top