PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Nutan Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order taking cognizance dated 10.01.2024 passed by the learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 1069 of 2023, by which learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Danapur has taken cognizance of offence under Section s 147 , 148, 149, 341, 323, 325 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code .
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioner along with other accused persons, had assaulted the informant causing injuries. Specific allegation against petitioners is that they had pelted stone and bricks from the rooftop, upon the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners and informant side are agnates and due to enmity with respect to the share in mall and shop, the ugly incidence took place, in which, both the parties indulged in free fight causing injury to either side. He further submitted that from very perusal of the FIR, it is evident that general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioner, who
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.