Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Vinay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. false accusations must be specified in matrimonial disputes. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. counsel proposes reconciliation efforts. (Para 5) |
| 3. court stresses caution in implicating extended family members. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial effort is required for reconciliation in matrimonial disputes. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. disposition and conditions for resolution in court. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. The petitioners have preferred the application under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the order taking cognizance dated 25.07.2019 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in Complaint Case No. 1318C of 2018 by which the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offences against the petitioners under Section 4 98A /34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act .
3. Prosecution story, in brief, is that the opposite party no. 2, Jyoti Kumari, filed a complaint on 25.10.2018 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Shar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
