Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Dr. Abhishek Pandey @ Abhishek Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the allegations in the fir. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by counsel for both parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations regarding matrimonial disputes and the need for reconciliation. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's directive for mediation and resolution before proceeding with criminal charges. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 12-12-2025 Heard Mr. Digvijay Kumar Ojha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Abhay Kumar –
1, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR dated 01.07.2018 in connection with Simri P.S. Case No.151 of 2018 whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 341 , 323, 354, 498A, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC and under sections
3 and 4 of the DP Act.
3. The prosecution story in brief is that marriage of O.P. No.2, Dr. Soniya Pandey, solemnized with petitioner no.1, Dr. Abhishek Pandey, in accordance with Hindu rites and customs, where her father and brother allegedly provided substantial dowry articles comprising Rs. 15,00,000/- in cash, gold and diamond ornaments worth Rs. 11,00,000/-, utensils and hou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
