Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Sitasharan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of matrimonial dispute leading to prosecution. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the necessity of dismissing claims. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's observations on family member implicating. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court emphasizes amicable resolution of disputes. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling on disposing of the application. (Para 16 , 18 , 22) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 12-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 23.11.2023 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VII, Saran (Chapra) in Complaint Case No. 2772 of 2023, Tr. No. 489 of 2024, by which learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VII, Saran (Chapra) has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 498 A of the Indian Penal Code .
3. The prosecution story in brief is that the complainant was married to one Sandeep Ranjan Singh on 02.01.2022 according to Hindu rites and customs. After few days of marriage, the husband of the complainant along with his family members, had started torturing her mentally and physical
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
